![]() ![]() "Neat Image team, ABSoft" is our full name. Basically, Neat Image can do everything that other contender does but also can do more by providing more control to the user.ģ. ![]() Neat Image can build profiles fully automatically (Auto Profile), semi-automatically (Auto Profile with assisted and controlled area selection) and manually (Rough Analyzer + Fine-Tuning Analyzer). In Neat Image, user can control the profiling process. Anyway, it is basically the same method of automatic building a noise profile but this process is hidden from the user. "Self-learning" sounds somewhat strange, doesn't it? It learns the properties of noise in the image, not properties of self. I expect more reviews to appear this year as Neat Image v5 uses an improved filter and noise analyzer that provide even more accurate filtration.Ģ. This type of software is the best choice for photographers who want to keep editing in a specific format. Yes, I agree that most comparisons used v4.x of Neat Image (and it shown very good results). Neat Image Noiseware Dfine Conclusion Capture One Pro Capture One Pro is a popular noise reduction software that also has an integrated RAW file processor. What is the relation between Neat Image and absoft? I keep seeing the two companies listed next to each other, but absoft has never had anything to do with images in my experience and I don't see Neat Image even listed on their site.ġ. Does NI have a response to this feature?ģ. This program touts a "Self-learning noise profile builder" unlike other programs. The other contender in my choice is Noiseware. Neat Image v8 standalone (Linux) standalone image noise reducer for Linux 64-bit or 32-bit. Neat Image v8 standalone (Mac) standalone image noise reducer for Mac OSX 10.7.5 or newer. ![]() Are there any head to head comparisons of the programs that give Neat Image a fair review using the current release?Ģ. standalone image noise reducer for Windows 10, 8, 7, Vista, XP 64-bit or 32-bit. Most of the reviews and comparisons online are for Neat Image 4, but the version now is 5. I would think each program could be fine tuned to meet the users desires, but those are my views without fine tuning.ġ. This agression smooths more noise out, but smooths more picture away as well, resulting in a bit of a plastic like look in places and muppet-like faces that isn't as noticeable in Neat Image. In this case, you will be able to get an acceptable quality, however, other softwares can probably do a better job. Overall, this is the great universal noise reduction software unless the photographs are too grainy. NN has the appearance of a better picture with just a quick look, but closer examination shows to me that it merely has a more aggressive filter. The Detail and Contrast sliders will help you to perfect the image further. In further comparison with Noise Ninja, I believe I now see a difference in the initial use of each program, one which perhaps illustrates your answer to question #3. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |